Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Disallowance of exemption claimed u/s54 of the ITAct,1961.

Avinash Joshi

Assessee has claimed exemption u/s 54 of the ITAct,1961, by investing ₹1crore in a residential flat developed by the developer on the sold residential house property wherein the Assessee had 20%undivided share .The Long term capital gain on transfer of house property thus invested in residential flat allotted by the developer.The learned Assessing Officer has refused exemption u/s 54 on the contention that the Assessee was not absolute owner of the house property sold to the developer.In his opinion the exemption is not available to the coowner of house property. This is a new concept for me.Kindly share your views.

Exemption Denied Under Section 54: Co-Owner Status Challenges Tax Break on Residential Flat Investment An individual sought advice on a forum regarding the disallowance of an exemption claimed under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The individual had invested 1 crore in a residential flat after selling a property in which they held a 20% undivided share. The Assessing Officer denied the exemption, arguing that the individual was not the absolute owner of the sold property, thus ineligible for the exemption as a co-owner. The individual expressed unfamiliarity with this interpretation and requested insights from others. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues