Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Case lows of Condonation delay by mistake of Lawyer's clerk

pravin bansal

Dear sir,

I want to case laws of high court for Condonation delay by mistake of Lawyer's clerk because my appeal rejected by commissioner (appeal) lucknow for delay of two days

Condonation of Delay: Court Restores Appeal After 536-Day Delay Due to Advocate's Fault, Emphasizing Fairness in Justice. A user sought case laws from a high court regarding condonation of delay due to a lawyer's clerk's mistake, as their appeal was rejected for a two-day delay. Another participant advised filing an appeal before the Tribunal and requested more details to provide relevant case laws. A subsequent reply discussed a High Court case where a 536-day delay was condoned due to an advocate's fault, emphasizing that litigants should not suffer due to their advocate's mistakes. The court ruled that delays should not prevent cases from being decided on their merits, restoring the appeal and imposing a cost. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues