Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 107539
Like 0 Bookmark

Rule 6(6) vii of CCR - clarification

Date 03 Nov 2014
Replies 8 Replies
Views 4166 Views
Customs duty exemption applicability: exemption status, not actual import, may suffice to claim Rule 6(6)(vii) relief.
To claim relief under Rule 6(6)(vii), goods must be exempt from customs additional duties (CVD and SAD), be supplied to projects procured through competitive bidding under the central excise notification, and fall within the notification's scope. A contested issue is whether actual importation is required; contributors argue import is not mandatory if the goods are exempt from CVD/SAD and supplied to eligible projects, because no cenvat would have been availed and thus no reversal is necessary, while the department contends import is essential. (AI Summary)

Dear Sir,

can we avail the exception under Rule 6(6) (vii) of CCR, 2004 if the goods supplied satisfy the eligibility conditions of notification 12/2012-CE

or it is available only for goods imported and supplied against (a), (b), (c) as provided in the definition in addition to satisfying the conditions of notification 12/2012 -CE?

Which view is correct? can anybody provide caselaws in this regard?

Thanks

8 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues