Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Cenvat credit of SAD - Reg

vinay wakde

We are purchasing imported Capital goods from various dealers. The Notification No. 102/2007 –Customs, dated 14.09.2007 has granted the exemption by way of refund of SAD to the dealers of imported goods.  However, the dealers were passing the credit of SAD to the buyer instead of claiming refund with the Department. We have taken CENVAT credit of SAD on the strength of valid duty paying documents, which is now objected by the Excise Auditors.  As per the Department, the dealer has to claim refund of SAD from the Department as per Notification No. 102/2007 –Customs, dated 14.09.2007.   Kindly clarify whether the objection taken by the Excise Auditor is correct and we have to reverse the credit?  

Regards,

VINAY

 

Debate Over CENVAT Credit on SAD for Imported Goods: Can Dealers Pass Credit or Must Claim Refund? A discussion on a forum addresses the issue of CENVAT credit of Special Additional Duty (SAD) on imported capital goods. The original query raises concerns about the objection by Excise Auditors who claim that dealers should claim a refund of SAD from the Department, as per Notification No. 102/2007-Customs. Various respondents argue against the auditors' stance, stating that passing the SAD credit to buyers is permissible and that the decision to claim a refund or pass on the duty lies with the dealer. They suggest that the auditors' objection lacks legal basis and understanding of the rules. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues