Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Circulars
of of All Circulars
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Board Rules No Deposit Needed for Property Offers; Avoids Unnecessary Financial Burdens and Complications.</h1> The Board has instructed that individuals offering to purchase property at a specific amount should not be required to make a deposit or provide a bank guarantee to prove their offer's authenticity. This directive follows a case where a complainant alleged that a property's sale price was understated and offered a higher amount. The Competent Authority had requested a deposit and bank guarantee, which led to complications. The Board concluded that such financial requirements do not necessarily reflect the property's market value at the time of registration and could lead to unnecessary issues.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
