Staff allocation of AAC posts aims to rebalance vacancies and reduce appeal pendency by reallocating posts across charges. Commissioners and Additional Commissioners must review old-strength AAC posts with demarcated ranges to identify surpluses for transfer, submit revised jurisdiction proposals excluding surrendered posts, and conduct joint consolidated proposals in multi-Commissioner charges with consultation for Central Circles. They must also reassess the allotment of newly created AAC posts in light of appeal pendency, indicate necessary changes in numbers, and ensure new posts are filled only after existing vacancies are utilised, with the administrative aim of reducing appeal pendency to a short-duration workload; detailed guidelines for jurisdiction proposals will follow.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Staff allocation of AAC posts aims to rebalance vacancies and reduce appeal pendency by reallocating posts across charges.
Commissioners and Additional Commissioners must review old-strength AAC posts with demarcated ranges to identify surpluses for transfer, submit revised jurisdiction proposals excluding surrendered posts, and conduct joint consolidated proposals in multi-Commissioner charges with consultation for Central Circles. They must also reassess the allotment of newly created AAC posts in light of appeal pendency, indicate necessary changes in numbers, and ensure new posts are filled only after existing vacancies are utilised, with the administrative aim of reducing appeal pendency to a short-duration workload; detailed guidelines for jurisdiction proposals will follow.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.