Assessment omissions cause appellate interference; ensure procedural safeguards so assessing officers can examine and rebut fresh evidence. Pilot review identified recurring assessment omissions and procedural lapses causing appellate interference; many additions reversed on appeal resulted from failures to present or record relevant material at assessment. The Board directed Commissioners to alert assessing officers to these pitfalls and instructed appellate authorities to afford assessing officers opportunity to examine and rebut fresh evidence produced at appeal.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Assessment omissions cause appellate interference; ensure procedural safeguards so assessing officers can examine and rebut fresh evidence.
Pilot review identified recurring assessment omissions and procedural lapses causing appellate interference; many additions reversed on appeal resulted from failures to present or record relevant material at assessment. The Board directed Commissioners to alert assessing officers to these pitfalls and instructed appellate authorities to afford assessing officers opportunity to examine and rebut fresh evidence produced at appeal.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.