SPV classification after concession termination continues under InvIT rules, with exit, acquisition and disclosure obligations. The conclusion or termination of a concession agreement does not alter the status of an SPV holding an infrastructure project under the InvIT framework, subject to specified conditions. The Investment Manager must, within one year from the later of the relevant agreement's end, resolution of pending claims or assessments, or completion of the defect liability period, either exit the investment by sale, liquidation, winding-up or merger, or acquire a new infrastructure project in the SPV. Until exit, detailed annual report disclosures are required at InvIT and SPV level.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
SPV classification after concession termination continues under InvIT rules, with exit, acquisition and disclosure obligations.
The conclusion or termination of a concession agreement does not alter the status of an SPV holding an infrastructure project under the InvIT framework, subject to specified conditions. The Investment Manager must, within one year from the later of the relevant agreement's end, resolution of pending claims or assessments, or completion of the defect liability period, either exit the investment by sale, liquidation, winding-up or merger, or acquire a new infrastructure project in the SPV. Until exit, detailed annual report disclosures are required at InvIT and SPV level.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.