Refund claim rejection must state specific reasons and unjust enrichment findings before crediting amounts to welfare fund. Adjudicating authorities must give specific, adequate reasons on each aspect when rejecting a refund claim, addressing merits and time-bar issues pointwise. If a claim is otherwise admissible but payment is precluded by unjust enrichment, the authority must record written findings and direct the eligible amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund. A refund may be granted only after admissibility on merits, timeliness, and a favourable unjust enrichment determination.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Refund claim rejection must state specific reasons and unjust enrichment findings before crediting amounts to welfare fund.
Adjudicating authorities must give specific, adequate reasons on each aspect when rejecting a refund claim, addressing merits and time-bar issues pointwise. If a claim is otherwise admissible but payment is precluded by unjust enrichment, the authority must record written findings and direct the eligible amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund. A refund may be granted only after admissibility on merits, timeliness, and a favourable unjust enrichment determination.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
