Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
CE-Supreme Court judgement dated 30.3.95 in the case of M/s. Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhavan Ltd. vs. CCE, Nagpur regarding classification of 'Dant Manjan Lal' - Regarding.
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Product classification as toilet requisite leads to denial of medicinal exemption and directs uniform tax treatment. The Supreme Court upheld Tribunal findings that 'Dant Manjan Lal' is a toilet requisite, not an Ayurvedic drug or medicine, and consequently not entitled to exemptions applicable to medicines. The Central Board of Excise & Customs accepted the judgment and directed field formations to apply this classification and deny exemption treatment to similar products.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Product classification as toilet requisite leads to denial of medicinal exemption and directs uniform tax treatment.
The Supreme Court upheld Tribunal findings that 'Dant Manjan Lal' is a toilet requisite, not an Ayurvedic drug or medicine, and consequently not entitled to exemptions applicable to medicines. The Central Board of Excise & Customs accepted the judgment and directed field formations to apply this classification and deny exemption treatment to similar products.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.