Unjust enrichment doctrine clarified for provisional assessments; proviso to Rule 9B added and appeal initiated. The Board clarified that the doctrine of unjust enrichment applies to refunds from provisional assessments by simplifying Rule 9B through a proviso added in June 1999; finding the tribunal view debatable, the Board secured legal advice, obtained Attorney General approval, filed a civil appeal, and instructed field formations to act in accordance with the amended provision.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Unjust enrichment doctrine clarified for provisional assessments; proviso to Rule 9B added and appeal initiated.
The Board clarified that the doctrine of unjust enrichment applies to refunds from provisional assessments by simplifying Rule 9B through a proviso added in June 1999; finding the tribunal view debatable, the Board secured legal advice, obtained Attorney General approval, filed a civil appeal, and instructed field formations to act in accordance with the amended provision.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.