While sending proposals for filing a civil appeal to the Supreme Court, Commissioners must ascertain whether the relied upon cases referred to in the CEGAT Order were accepted or appealed against
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Appeal screening for precedent reliance: ensure cases cited in tribunal orders were accepted or appealed accordingly. Commissioners must ascertain whether cases relied upon in CEGAT orders were accepted or appealed before proposing civil appeals; consult the Judicial Cell's monthly statement listing CEGAT orders against which civil appeals have been filed, and use that information to avoid relying on precedents already appealed by the Board under the relevant central excise and customs appeal provisions.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal screening for precedent reliance: ensure cases cited in tribunal orders were accepted or appealed accordingly.
Commissioners must ascertain whether cases relied upon in CEGAT orders were accepted or appealed before proposing civil appeals; consult the Judicial Cell's monthly statement listing CEGAT orders against which civil appeals have been filed, and use that information to avoid relying on precedents already appealed by the Board under the relevant central excise and customs appeal provisions.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.