Non-speaking appellate order not treated as binding precedent; reasoned judgments required for precedential effect. A supreme appellate order dismissing an appeal in limine in GMMCO is a non-speaking order and, per the Law Ministry's view citing prior authorities, a decision without reasons does not constitute a ratio decidendi and therefore should not be given binding effect as precedent; the Department of Revenue directed circulation of this opinion to officers for information and action.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Non-speaking appellate order not treated as binding precedent; reasoned judgments required for precedential effect.
A supreme appellate order dismissing an appeal in limine in GMMCO is a non-speaking order and, per the Law Ministry's view citing prior authorities, a decision without reasons does not constitute a ratio decidendi and therefore should not be given binding effect as precedent; the Department of Revenue directed circulation of this opinion to officers for information and action.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.