Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Delay in appellate petition filing now requires named officer responsibility for late submissions under SOP. An instruction identifies systemic delays in appellate petition filings and directs that if a petition proposal reaches the legal directorate more than ninety days after judgment, the CCIT/DGIT must fix responsibility and the proposal must name the officer(s) responsible, to enforce SOP filing standards and internal accountability.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Delay in appellate petition filing now requires named officer responsibility for late submissions under SOP.
An instruction identifies systemic delays in appellate petition filings and directs that if a petition proposal reaches the legal directorate more than ninety days after judgment, the CCIT/DGIT must fix responsibility and the proposal must name the officer(s) responsible, to enforce SOP filing standards and internal accountability.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.