Vakalatnama procedural compliance: ensure timely, properly authorised filings and affidavits to prevent delay-related litigation risks. Guidance identifies recurring filing defects in Supreme Court departmental appeals: delayed or improperly executed Vakalatnama (including signatures not at Commissioner rank, missing rubber stamp, incorrect format), and submission of additional documents without supporting affidavits. It stresses the need for officers to monitor departmental and court websites, warns that delay causes litigation losses and revenue risk, and directs the Directorate of Legal Affairs to institute zonal Sensitisation cum Awareness training for officers preparing and filing appeals.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Vakalatnama procedural compliance: ensure timely, properly authorised filings and affidavits to prevent delay-related litigation risks.
Guidance identifies recurring filing defects in Supreme Court departmental appeals: delayed or improperly executed Vakalatnama (including signatures not at Commissioner rank, missing rubber stamp, incorrect format), and submission of additional documents without supporting affidavits. It stresses the need for officers to monitor departmental and court websites, warns that delay causes litigation losses and revenue risk, and directs the Directorate of Legal Affairs to institute zonal Sensitisation cum Awareness training for officers preparing and filing appeals.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
