Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Circulars
of of All Circulars
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Strict Compliance Required for Rule 3(2)(ii)-(iv) of CCS Conduct Rules: Written Confirmation of Directions Essential.</h1> Instructions have been issued to ensure strict compliance with Rule 3(2)(ii) to (iv) of the CCS (Conduct) Rules. These rules emphasize that government servants must act in their best judgment unless directed otherwise by a superior, and such directions should be in writing. Oral directions are discouraged and must be confirmed in writing if unavoidable. This is to prevent issues arising from unrecorded instructions, as seen in vigilance complaints where Assessing Officers claimed actions were directed by superiors without written confirmation. Compliance with these rules is mandatory to avoid punitive measures.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
