Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Circulars
of of All Circulars
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Nominated directors' written consent to the company is unnecessary; filing with the Registrar u/s 264(2) suffices.</h1> Nominated directors are not required to file written consent with the company when appointed, as the government ensures that only willing individuals are nominated for directorship. Filing consent with the Registrar under section 264(2) is deemed sufficient, and additional consent filing with the company under subsection (1) is unnecessary. This directive clarifies that the process of obtaining consent from nominated directors is streamlined to avoid redundancy, as their willingness is already established by their nomination.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
