Place of passing property determines outside sale status under Article 286(1)(a) when auction sale completes at the auction site.

Sales of tea auctioned at Fort Cochin were treated as outside sales for Travancore-Cochin because property passed when the hammer fell there, with price payment and delivery orders also occurring there. The relevant constitutional test was where the sale was completed by passing of property, not where physical delivery was later taken. The Explanation to Article 286(1)(a) did not apply because there was no direct delivery for consumption in Travancore-Cochin as a result of the sale. The same reasoning applied to goods exported out of India, since title had already passed at Fort Cochin. The Travancore-Cochin sales tax assessment therefore could not stand.

---

---

Issues: Whether the sales of tea were sales taking place outside the State of Travancore-Cochin and were therefore not taxable under Article 286(1)(a) of the Constitution.

Analysis: The tea was auctioned at Fort Cochin, the price was paid there, and delivery orders were issued there, while actual physical delivery was taken at Willingdon Island. The relevant question was whether the taxable sale was to be located where property passed under the Sale of Goods Act or where delivery was ultimately made. Applying the principle recognised in the earlier decision that the passing of property within a State is the material factor for determining whether a sale is inside or outside the State, the Court held that the sales of full lots were complete when the hammer fell at Fort Cochin. The constitutional Explanation to Article 286(1)(a) did not apply because there was no delivery as a direct result of the sale for consumption in Travancore-Cochin. The same reasoning applied to the goods exported out of India, since the title had already passed at Fort Cochin.

Conclusion: The sales were outside sales qua Travancore-Cochin and were not liable to tax in that State.

Final Conclusion: The assessment based on Travancore-Cochin sales tax could not stand, and the assessee succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of Article 286(1)(a), a sale is outside the State where property in the goods passes outside that State, unless the constitutional Explanation applies on account of delivery for consumption in another State as a direct result of the sale.

---