Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Bihar Sales Tax: Exemption for Goods Delivered Outside State for Consumption</h1> <h3>Indian Copper Corporation Ltd. Versus The State of Bihar and Others</h3> Indian Copper Corporation Ltd. Versus The State of Bihar and Others - [1961] 12 STC 56 (SC), 1961 AIR 347, 1961 (2) SCR 276 Issues Involved:1. Whether sales under which goods were delivered outside the State of Bihar for consumption but not within the State of first delivery or first destination are exempt from the levy of sales tax by the Bihar State by virtue of Article 286(1)(a) of the Constitution.2. Whether the appellant must prove that goods delivered outside Bihar were actually consumed in the State of first destination to claim exemption from sales tax.3. The interpretation and application of Article 286(1)(a) and its Explanation in the context of the Bihar Sales Tax Act.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Exemption from Sales Tax under Article 286(1)(a)The core issue was whether sales, where goods were delivered outside Bihar for consumption but not within the State of first delivery, are exempt from sales tax by the Bihar State under Article 286(1)(a) of the Constitution. The Court examined the interpretation of Article 286(1)(a) and its Explanation, which states that a sale is deemed to have taken place in the State where goods are delivered as a direct result of the sale for the purpose of consumption in that State, even if the property in the goods passed in another State.The Court held that the Explanation to Article 286(1)(a) covers sales where goods are delivered in a State for consumption in that State, making such sales 'inside' the State of delivery and 'outside' the State of origin. Therefore, the Bihar State cannot levy sales tax on such transactions. However, if the goods were delivered outside Bihar but not for consumption in the State of first destination, the sale does not fall within the Explanation and is not exempt from Bihar's sales tax.Issue 2: Proof of Actual ConsumptionThe High Court had required the appellant to prove that goods delivered outside Bihar were actually consumed in the State of first destination to claim exemption. The appellant contended that under the Explanation to Article 286(1)(a), it is sufficient if the goods were delivered for the purpose of consumption in the State of first destination, irrespective of whether they were actually consumed there.The Supreme Court agreed with the appellant, stating that the requirement is satisfied if the goods were delivered for the purpose of consumption in the State of first destination. The actual consumption of the goods in that State is not necessary to claim exemption. The High Court's requirement for proof of actual consumption was deemed an unwarranted addition to the Explanation's requirements.Issue 3: Interpretation and Application of Article 286(1)(a)The Court discussed the legislative intent behind Article 286(1)(a) and its Explanation, emphasizing that the provision aims to prevent multiple taxation by different States on the same transaction. The Explanation provides a legal fiction to determine the locus of a sale based on delivery and consumption, simplifying the complex issue of determining the 'situs' of a sale.The Court noted that the Bihar Sales Tax Act, as adapted post-Constitution, incorporates the restrictions of Article 286, preventing the State from taxing sales deemed to take place outside Bihar under the Explanation. However, sales not covered by the Explanation but having a real territorial nexus with Bihar could still be taxed by the State.ConclusionThe Supreme Court modified the High Court's order, clarifying that the appellant is entitled to exemption from sales tax if goods were delivered outside Bihar for the purpose of consumption in the State of first destination, without needing to prove actual consumption. The appeal was otherwise dismissed, with no order as to costs. The Bihar State's power to levy sales tax is restricted by the Explanation to Article 286(1)(a), preventing it from taxing sales deemed to take place outside Bihar.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found