Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a company converted from a private limited company into a public limited company during the pendency of a suit ceases to be competent to continue the proceeding in its new name and whether the amendment sought to the plaint was permissible.
Analysis: The provisions governing change of name and conversion of a company were read together to hold that such conversion does not affect the rights and obligations of the company or its legal identity. The statutory scheme preserves pending proceedings and allows them to continue by the new name of the company. Since only the form of the company and its name changed, the application for amendment was competent and the proceedings were not rendered defective.
Conclusion: The objection to the amendment failed, and the revision petition was without merit.