Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents, acting as middlemen or commission agents in coal transactions controlled by the Colliery Control Order, carried on the business of selling goods so as to be dealers liable to registration under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953.
Analysis: Under the control order, coal could be acquired only by a person holding the requisite authority, and the certificate in question showed the consumer as consignee. The arrangement disclosed no sale by the colliery to the respondents and then by the respondents to the consumer. The respondents merely arranged the transaction for the disclosed purchaser and guaranteed payment to the colliery. On the facts, they did not purchase the coal, did not become its owners, and did not effect sales as principals or as authorised commission agents.
Conclusion: The respondents were not dealers within the meaning of the Act and were not liable to registration on the transaction cited.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was without merit, and the Tribunal's view that the respondents did not carry on a business of selling coal was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a controlled supply arrangement permits only a sale to the certificate holder and the intermediary merely arranges delivery for a disclosed purchaser while guaranteeing payment, the intermediary does not effect a taxable sale and is not a dealer.