Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 21(4) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 permitted forfeiture of amounts collected by a registered dealer by way of tax on transactions that were not sales, where the aggregate collection exceeded the tax payable for the year.
Analysis: Sections 21(1) and 21(2) prohibited collection of tax in specified sale-related situations, but section 21(4) used broader language and provided for forfeiture where any registered dealer collected any amount by way of tax in excess of the amount payable by him. The amount payable under the Act was the tax assessed on the dealer's annual turnover of sales, not the tax on each individual transaction. On that construction, collections by way of tax on non-sale transactions could be taken into account in determining whether the annual aggregate collection exceeded the amount actually payable. The provision was intended to prevent abuse of the taxing scheme and to deny retention of amounts collected without corresponding liability to pay tax to the State.
Conclusion: Section 21(4) applied to the excess collected by the petitioners, including amounts collected on transactions which were not sales, and the forfeiture was valid.