Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether transactions in goods sent to persons described as selling agents outside the Province were sales within the meaning of the C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947, so as to be included in the taxable turnover in Madhya Pradesh.
Analysis: Explanation II to section 2(g) provided that where the goods in respect of which a sale is concluded are within the State at the time the contract of sale is made, the sale is deemed to have taken place in Madhya Pradesh, regardless of where the contract is ultimately completed. The Board of Revenue had recorded a definite finding that the contracts of sale were made when the goods were situate within the Province. On those findings, the legal consequence under the Explanation followed automatically. The contention that there was no material to support the finding could not be entertained, as no such question had been properly referred.
Conclusion: The transactions were sales within the meaning of the Act and were rightly treated as sales made within Madhya Pradesh.