Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the company court has inherent power under Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 to extend the time for holding an annual general meeting, notwithstanding the express scheme of sections 166, 167 and 186 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Analysis: Section 166 imposes a statutory obligation to hold the annual general meeting within the prescribed time and confers a limited power on the Registrar alone to extend time for not more than three months. Section 167 provides the specific remedy where default has already occurred, empowering the Central Government to call or direct the calling of the meeting and to issue consequential directions. Section 186 confers court power only in relation to meetings other than annual general meetings, showing that the legislature intentionally excluded the court from intervening in the calling of annual general meetings. The inherent jurisdiction preserved by Rule 9 cannot be used to override an express statutory scheme or to transfer to the court a power that the Act confers on another authority. Relief under section 633(2) concerns excuse from liability for default and does not include extension of time for holding the meeting.
Conclusion: The company court has no inherent power to extend the time for holding the annual general meeting, and the application was not maintainable.