Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeal against deletion of mandatory penalty under Section 11AC could survive after the assessee's dispute had been settled under the KVS Scheme and Form 3 had been issued in full and final settlement.
Analysis: The assessee's earlier appeal against confirmation of duty demand and penalty had already been disposed of under the KVS Scheme. The designated authority had accepted the settlement application and issued Form 3, evidencing full and final settlement of the dispute. In view of such settlement, the controversy regarding mandatory penalty could no longer be pursued independently.
Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal was not maintainable after settlement under the KVS Scheme and was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Once a dispute is settled under the KVS Scheme and full and final settlement is recorded through the prescribed form, connected proceedings and appeals relating to the same matter cannot be agitated further.