Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether chemicals used for phosphating and surface treatment before phosphating were admissible inputs for Modvat credit. (ii) Whether pens used for colour coding and marking of components to ensure correct assembly were admissible inputs for Modvat credit.
Issue (i): Whether chemicals used for phosphating and surface treatment before phosphating were admissible inputs for Modvat credit.
Analysis: The chemicals were used in connection with the manufacture of the final product and, on the facts noticed, had already been treated as eligible inputs in a similar matter concerning the same assessee.
Conclusion: The chemicals were eligible inputs and Modvat credit was admissible.
Issue (ii): Whether pens used for colour coding and marking of components to ensure correct assembly were admissible inputs for Modvat credit.
Analysis: The pens were used to identify the proper components for use in manufacture, and such use was treated as sufficiently connected with the manufacturing process to qualify as input use.
Conclusion: The pens were eligible inputs and Modvat credit was admissible.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed on both counts, and the orders allowing Modvat credit to the assessee were left undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used in activities integrally connected with manufacture and necessary for producing the final product qualify as eligible inputs for Modvat credit.