Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported second-hand multi-spindle copying/duplicating and profile milling machine fell within Item No. 12 of Appendix-I Part-B of the Import Policy 1985-88 and was therefore eligible for import under the Open General Licence.
Analysis: The machine had one vertical spindle and one horizontal spindle, and the technical material relied on showed that special-purpose milling machines may have horizontal, vertical and angular spindles operating either one after another or simultaneously. The competing expert material was treated as insufficient to displace the importer's case. The entry in the Import Policy was construed on its own terms, and where any doubt remained as to the scope of the entry, the interpretation beneficial to the importer was preferred.
Conclusion: The machine was held to fall within Item No. 12 of Appendix-I Part-B of the Import Policy 1985-88, and the import was treated as permissible under the Open General Licence.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal succeeded, with consequential relief according to law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the scope of an import policy entry is open to doubt, and the competing constructions are equally possible, the construction favourable to the importer must be adopted.