Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the employer's contribution to the provident fund, due from a company in liquidation, was entitled to preferential payment in winding up notwithstanding the objection that the claim was not specifically pleaded as preferential.
Analysis: Section 11 of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 gives priority to the employer's contribution payable to the provident fund where the employer is a company under liquidation. Section 530 of the Companies Act, 1956 provides priority for sums due from a provident fund maintained by the company, and the contribution payable under the Employees' Provident Funds Act falls within that description. The omission to expressly label the claim as preferential in the affidavit was only a technical defect. The priority attached by operation of law under the mandatory scheme of the winding-up provisions.
Conclusion: The claim was entitled to be treated as a preferential claim and the objection based on the form of proof did not defeat priority.