Credit on processed scrap and captive intermediate use remains intact where no rule requires reversal.

Cast iron scrap processed into chips and small particles was not treated as inputs cleared as such; it was correctly characterised as waste and scrap arising during processing under Rule 57F(18), so the clearance did not attract Rule 57F(3). Credit taken on the original scrap also did not require reversal merely because moulding boxes made from it were used captively in manufacturing another dutiable final product. The intermediate captive use did not cause the credit to lapse, and no rule required the suggested duty-and-recredit procedure. The assessee's treatment was upheld on both issues.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether chips and small particles arising from breaking of cast iron scrap and cleared from the factory were to be treated as inputs cleared as such under Rule 57F(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, or as waste and scrap under Rule 57F(18) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. (ii) Whether credit taken on cast iron scrap was required to be reversed when moulding boxes manufactured therefrom were used captively in the manufacture of another dutiable final product.

Issue (i): Whether chips and small particles arising from breaking of cast iron scrap and cleared from the factory were to be treated as inputs cleared as such under Rule 57F(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, or as waste and scrap under Rule 57F(18) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The inputs were not removed in the same form in which they were received. Their shape and form had changed during processing, and the resultant material was only chips and small particles of waste and scrap. On the facts recorded, the goods could not be treated as inputs cleared as such. The applicable treatment was therefore that of waste and scrap arising in the course of processing.

Conclusion: The clearance was not under Rule 57F(3); it was correctly covered by Rule 57F(18), in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether credit taken on cast iron scrap was required to be reversed when moulding boxes manufactured therefrom were used captively in the manufacture of another dutiable final product.

Analysis: The credit taken on the scrap was not lost merely because an intermediate product emerged and was used captively in further manufacture. The suggested procedure of first paying duty on the moulding boxes and then taking credit again was not required by any rule and was revenue neutral. The intermediate product was used in the manufacture of the final dutiable product, attracting the principle that credit does not lapse on such captive use.

Conclusion: No reversal of credit was required, in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge to both issues failed, and the common order in favour of the assessee stood affirmed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the processed goods are not removed as such but emerge as waste, scrap, or an intermediate product used captively in further dutiable manufacture, the credit taken on the original inputs is not denied or required to be reversed absent a specific rule mandating such reversal.

---