Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner (Appeals) had power to condone delay beyond the period prescribed under Section 128 of the Customs Act and whether the appeal was maintainable when filed beyond the statutory limit.
Analysis: The appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was filed beyond the prescribed period. The statutory scheme allows filing within three months from communication of the order and permits condonation only for a further three months on sufficient cause being shown. The period for condonation is fixed by the statute itself, and the authority cannot enlarge it beyond the limit expressly provided. The settled position, as recognised by the Tribunal and the Apex Court, is that where the legislature has fixed a statutory time limit, the authority has no power to extend it further.
Conclusion: The Commissioner (Appeals) had no power to condone delay beyond the statutory period, and the appeal was rightly treated as barred by time and not maintainable.