Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>CEGAT Kolkata: Duty demand of Rs. 1,13,322.25 set aside as time-barred due to absence of Rule 9B order</h1> <h3>BENGAL IRON INDUSTRY Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CALCUTTA-II</h3> BENGAL IRON INDUSTRY Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CALCUTTA-II - 2001 (136) E.L.T. 265 (Tri. - Kolkata) The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata, in the case of Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, set aside the demand of duty of Rs. 1,13,322.25 as it was barred by limitation since no order for provisional assessment was issued under Rule 9B. The Tribunal ruled that assessments pending approval of classification list must be treated as provisional only if orders for provisional assessments are issued under Rule 9B, except in situations covered by Rule 173CC.