TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether interleaving kraft paper used in the process of cold rolling and manufacture of stainless steel strips could be treated as an input used in or in relation to manufacture for the purpose of Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944; (ii) whether the same kraft paper could be treated as equipment or appliance excluded from the definition of input.
Issue (i): whether interleaving kraft paper used in the process of cold rolling and manufacture of stainless steel strips could be treated as an input used in or in relation to manufacture for the purpose of Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944
Analysis: The paper was used at every stage of coiling and recoiling to prevent friction, scratches and defects, and to maintain quality of the final product. The reasoning accepted that material used within the factory in relation to manufacture falls within the inclusive definition of input unless specifically excluded by the explanation to Rule 57A. The paper was not consumed as machinery or plant and was part of the manufacturing process itself.
Conclusion: The kraft paper was held to be an input eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): whether the same kraft paper could be treated as equipment or appliance excluded from the definition of input
Analysis: The exclusion in Rule 57A covered machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools and appliances used for production or processing. The paper used for interleaving was neither apparatus nor tool, and it was not an appliance, equipment, plant, machinery or machine. It was a consumable material used in the manufacture and not a device for production.
Conclusion: The kraft paper was not equipment or an appliance, and the exclusion did not apply, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the substantive reference and was held entitled to the Modvat benefit in respect of interleaving kraft paper used in manufacture.
Ratio Decidendi: A material used repeatedly within the manufacturing process, and essential for producing defect-free goods, is an input used in relation to manufacture unless it falls within a specific exclusion; consumable process materials are not to be treated as machinery, equipment or appliances.
TaxTMI 
