Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether conversion of the advance licence from value based to quantity based entitled the importer to claim the benefit of the later notification for imports made before the date of conversion, and whether the adjudication required reconsideration on the basis of the DGFT's view.
Analysis: The licence conversion was found to have been permitted by the DGFT, and the adjudicating authority had not considered the communication in its entirety. At the same time, the record showed that some imports were made before conversion and some after it, so the effect of the conversion on earlier imports could not be determined finally without ascertaining the DGFT's opinion on retrospective application.
Conclusion: The impugned order could not be sustained in its present form, and the matter had to be reconsidered after obtaining the DGFT's opinion and giving the importer an opportunity of hearing.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent that the matter was sent back for fresh decision after reconsideration of the licence conversion issue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the retrospective effect of an advance licence conversion is material to exemption eligibility, the adjudicating authority must obtain the competent authority's view before deciding liability.