Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether compensation paid to outgoing directors for loss of office was an admissible deduction as business expenditure under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The payment was made after the seat of management was shifted from the United Kingdom to India and the company sought to end an expensive mode of carrying on business. The articles of association fixed the directors' remuneration and term of office, and on that footing the outgoing directors were treated as having been engaged under a contractual arrangement with the company. Even apart from contract, the payment was held to have been dictated by commercial expediency because it facilitated the business, reduced recurring expenditure, and improved the conduct and supervision of operations. The statutory formula was wider than the earlier test of expenditure incurred solely for earning profits, and a direct nexus with immediate profit was not necessary.
Conclusion: The compensation was an allowable deduction under section 10(2)(xv) and the answer to the reference was in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment made to terminate an expensive business arrangement and to facilitate the efficient carrying on of the business, if not capital in nature, is deductible as expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business.