Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the liability of B contributories in a winding up became fixed on the making of the call, and whether release or extinction of the relevant pre-transfer debts before any effectual call reduced that liability.
Analysis: The liability of past members under section 212 of the Companies Act, 1948 arose only where the existing members were unable to satisfy the required contributions, and a valid call had to comply with rule 88 of the Companies (Winding Up) Rules, 1949. The notice of May 3, 1957 was not an effective call because the prescribed form had not been filed, and the earlier call of December 20, 1955 could not operate against the B contributories because their statutory liability had not yet arisen. Section 214 did not create an enforceable debt against them at that stage. Since no valid call had been made before the old debts were released, the release operated to reduce the B contributories' liability pro tanto.
Conclusion: The liability of the B contributories had not crystallised by an effectual call, and the release of the old debts reduced their liability. The appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: In a winding up, a past member's liability cannot be enforced, or treated as crystallised, until the statutory preconditions to liability are satisfied and a valid call is made; if the relevant debts are released before that stage, the past member's liability is reduced accordingly.