Arbitration clause scope: dispute denying the transaction's existence falls outside jurisdiction unless clearly covered by the agreement.
An arbitration clause limited to disputes arising out of or in the course of a transaction does not, without clear words, cover a dispute denying the very existence of that transaction; jurisdiction cannot arise merely from consent or appearance, and the award was treated as without jurisdiction. The articles of association were also treated as capable of operating as a binding written arbitration arrangement between members for transactions within the chamber's business, on the basis that members knowingly dealing within that commercial framework accept its contractual effect. On that reasoning, the appeal succeeded because the tribunal was incompetent to decide the preliminary dispute.
Issues: (i) Whether a dispute as to the very existence of the alleged contract or transaction fell within the arbitration clause contained in the chamber articles and bye-laws, so as to confer jurisdiction on the Lavad Committee; (ii) Whether the articles of association constituted a written arbitration agreement between members inter se for private commercial transactions.
Issue (i): Whether a dispute as to the very existence of the alleged contract or transaction fell within the arbitration clause contained in the chamber articles and bye-laws, so as to confer jurisdiction on the Lavad Committee.
Analysis: The arbitration obligation in the relevant article was confined to disputes arising out of or in course of dealings and transactions between members. A dispute denying the very existence of the transaction is antecedent to, and distinct from, disputes arising under an admitted transaction. Bye-laws could not enlarge a clear and limited article of association, and jurisdiction of the tribunal had to rest on a prior arbitration agreement. Consent or appearance before the committee could not cure the absence of jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The dispute as to the existence of the contract was not covered by the arbitration agreement, and the award was therefore without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside in favour of the appellant.
Issue (ii): Whether the articles of association constituted a written arbitration agreement between members inter se for private commercial transactions.
Analysis: Section 21 of the Companies Act was treated as making the articles binding between members inter se, but the scope of that contractual fiction was debated. The Court preferred the broader view that, where members knowingly entered transactions in a commodity within the chamber's field of business, the articles could operate as a general contractual framework governing their dealings, including the arbitration clause. The object of avoiding recourse to ordinary courts and the practical working of commercial chambers supported that construction.
Conclusion: The articles of association could operate as a binding written arbitration arrangement between members inter se in respect of transactions falling within the chamber's business.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded because the impugned award could not stand after the tribunal was found incompetent to determine the preliminary dispute about the existence of the transaction.
Ratio Decidendi: An arbitration clause framed in terms of disputes arising out of or in course of a transaction does not, without clear words, extend to a dispute denying the very existence of the transaction, and a tribunal derives jurisdiction only from a valid written arbitration agreement covering the specific dispute.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
