Chemical evidence of tea waste and no proof of clandestine removal left the assessee's classification undisturbed.

Chemical examination supported classification of the disputed goods as tea waste, because the samples lacked the normal characteristics and flavour of tea. In the absence of additional evidence from the Revenue to show clandestine removal or substitution, the factual finding that the goods were tea waste under the Tea Waste (Control) Order, 1959 remained undisturbed. The appellate view in favour of the assessee was therefore left intact, and the alleged clandestine removal was treated as unproved.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Revenue had established clandestine removal of tea and whether the material on record supported the finding that the goods were tea waste under the Tea Waste (Control) Order, 1959.

Analysis: The disputed samples were tested by the Chemical Examiner, whose report indicated that the goods did not have the normal characteristics and flavour of tea and was consistent with tea waste. The appellate authority had accepted the report and found no justification for treating samples arising from the same test report differently. In the absence of any further material from the Revenue to prove surreptitious removal or substitution, there was no basis to disturb the factual findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals).

Conclusion: The allegation of clandestine removal was not proved, and the order allowing the appeal of the assessee was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the chemical examination report supports the classification of the goods as tea waste and the Revenue produces no further evidence of clandestine removal, the appellate finding in favour of the assessee is not liable to be interfered with.

---