Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjudication order was vitiated for travelling beyond the scope of the show cause notice and corrigendum by introducing a new classification without notice or opportunity to contest.
Analysis: The classification sub-heading finally adopted in adjudication was neither proposed in the original show cause notice nor in the corrigendum. The assessee was not given any opportunity to meet that basis of classification. An adjudication that proceeds on a ground not put to notice cannot be sustained, as it denies a fair opportunity of defence.
Conclusion: The order was set aside as having travelled beyond the show cause notice, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication after affording the assessee an opportunity to present its defence.
Ratio Decidendi: An adjudication order cannot introduce and rely upon a classification or ground not contained in the show cause notice without first giving the affected party notice and an opportunity to meet that case.