Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Directors' Discretion Upheld in Share Transfer Refusal</h1> The court upheld the directors' discretion in refusing to register the share transfer, emphasizing the importance of respecting the articles of ... Transfer of Shares – Power to refuse registration and appeal against refusal and Directors - Power of Issues:1. Interpretation of articles of association regarding transfer of shares.2. Directors' discretion in refusing to register transfer of shares.3. Allegations of mala fide conduct and lack of judicial consideration against directors.4. Legal principles governing directors' discretion in company matters.Interpretation of articles of association regarding transfer of shares:The case involved an application concerning the transfer of shares of a company with specific articles of association governing share transfers. The articles provided for restrictions on share transfers, requiring directors to find purchasers among existing members before allowing transfers to outsiders. Article 23 granted directors the discretion to refuse to register a share transfer if they deemed the transferee undesirable for company membership. The court noted the importance of adhering to the articles' provisions in share transfer matters.Directors' discretion in refusing to register transfer of shares:The directors of the company refused to register a transfer of shares based on their discretion under Article 23, deeming the proposed transferees unsuitable for company membership. The court emphasized that directors have the right to exercise their discretion in such matters without being compelled to provide reasons for their decision. The court highlighted the need for shareholders challenging directors' decisions to prove mala fides or arbitrary conduct on the part of the directors, failing which the directors' decision should be respected.Allegations of mala fide conduct and lack of judicial consideration against directors:The applicants alleged mala fide conduct and lack of judicial consideration on the part of the directors in refusing to register the share transfer. However, the court found the allegations vague and unconvincing, emphasizing the need for specific and substantiated claims to challenge directors' decisions. The court cited legal precedents to support the directors' right to exercise discretion in company matters without being obligated to disclose reasons for their decisions.Legal principles governing directors' discretion in company matters:The judgment highlighted key legal principles governing directors' discretion in company affairs, emphasizing the need for shareholders to respect directors' powers as outlined in the articles of association. Shareholders dissatisfied with directors' decisions should follow the procedures for removing directors as per the articles rather than challenging their decisions directly. The court dismissed the application, stating that directors were entitled to exercise their powers without shareholder interference, even if shareholders disagreed with their decisions.In conclusion, the court upheld the directors' discretion in refusing to register the share transfer, emphasizing the importance of respecting the articles of association and legal principles governing directors' powers in company matters.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
