1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court denies petition to reduce payment to liquidator of Peoples Bank of Northern India</h1> The Court dismissed Khan Bahadur Mian Chiragh Din's petition seeking a reduction in the amount payable to the Liquidator of the Peoples Bank of Northern ... Winding up - Liquidator to exercise certain powers subject to sanction Issues:Reduction of amount payable to the Liquidator of the Peoples Bank of Northern India by Khan Bahadur Mian Chiragh Din.Analysis:The petitioner, Khan Bahadur Mian Chiragh Din, sought a reduction in the amount payable to the Liquidator of the Peoples Bank of Northern India. The Bank closed its doors, and the petitioner owed money on three accounts. The Court had previously reduced the interest payable on the amount due. The petitioner had paid Rs. 13,000 in part payment and now requested a further reduction. However, the liquidator opposed any reduction, citing legal provisions governing compromises with debtors. Rule 68 of the Court's Rules and Orders required the liquidator to support any compromise with an affidavit stating it would benefit the Company. Section 234 of the Companies Act empowered the liquidator, with the Court's sanction, to compromise debts and liabilities. The Court referred to English case law, emphasizing that the Court could not compel a liquidator to accept a compromise if it was not in the best interest of the Company. The Court held that in this case, the liquidator was not in a position to demonstrate that the proposed reduction would benefit the Company, leading to the dismissal of the petition.