Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the particulars of a contract recorded in Form VII under section 104 of the Indian Companies Act, relating to allotment of fully paid shares otherwise than in cash, amount to a "conveyance" within the meaning of the Stamp Act.
Analysis: The Court examined the nature of allotment by a company of its shares for consideration other than cash and the definition of "conveyance" in the Stamp Act. It considered whether a company, when issuing shares for the first time, can be regarded as transferring property such that the instrument records a conveyance; contrasted the position of shares as property in the hands of a shareholder with the company's act of original issue; and noted that the issue of shares does not involve transfer of property already vested in the company. The Court observed that the case did not require resolution of ancillary arguments based on the Sale of Goods Act concerning appropriation of unascertained goods.
Conclusion: The contract particulars recorded in Form VII did not amount to a "conveyance" within the meaning of the Stamp Act; Form VII was correctly treated as an agreement, not a conveyance.
Ratio Decidendi: An original issue or allotment of shares by a company to an allottee does not constitute a transfer of property by the company and therefore does not amount to a "conveyance" under the Stamp Act.