Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the special resolution for refund of share capital and its subsequent confirmation are valid despite non-compliance with the statutory interval prescribed for confirmation under the Indian Companies Act.
Analysis: The petition sought the Court's confirmation of a special resolution authorising a refund of Rs. 150 per share. The statutory requirement in Section 81(2)(b) prescribes that the confirming meeting must be held not less than fourteen days and not more than one month after the first meeting. The subsequent meeting was held outside the mandatory interval, resulting in non-compliance with the statutory requirement applicable to confirmation of the resolution.
Conclusion: The confirmation did not comply with the mandatory interval prescribed by Section 81(2)(b) and is therefore invalid; the petition for confirmation is dismissed.