Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of the two months preferential wage claim under section 230, the period "within the two months next before the said date" is to be reckoned from the date of the voluntary winding up resolution or from the date of the subsequent compulsory winding up order where a voluntary winding up is followed by a compulsory winding up.
Analysis: Section 230(1)(b) grants priority for wages earned "within the two months next before the said date." Section 230(5) defines the relevant "date" as the date of the winding up order in a compulsory winding up which had not previously commenced voluntarily, and otherwise as the date of the commencement of the winding up. Where a voluntary winding up precedes a compulsory winding up, the commencement of winding up occurs on the date of the voluntary resolution. The statutory language treats winding up as a continuous process that may commence voluntarily and continue by compulsory order; therefore the two month period must be counted from the commencement of the voluntary winding up. An English decision on a different provision concerning fraudulent preferences was distinguished on the basis that the two provisions differ in wording and purpose and thus do not control the construction of the preferential claim provision.
Conclusion: The two months period for preferential wage claims under section 230 is to be reckoned from the date of the voluntary winding up resolution where a voluntary winding up is later continued by a compulsory winding up; accordingly the claimants are entitled to preference measured from the date of the voluntary winding up.