Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application to bring the legal representatives of a deceased contributory on record was necessary and whether it was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The liquidation proceedings were governed by Act VI of 1882 by virtue of section 284 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. Under section 126 of the Indian Companies Act, where a contributory dies after being placed on the list of contributories, his personal representatives, heirs and devisees become liable in due course of administration and are deemed to be contributories accordingly. On that construction, the representatives step into the deceased contributory's position automatically, so no separate application was required merely to create liability or substitute them. Since the step was only a notification to the Court of the death, no question of limitation arose.
Conclusion: The application was not barred by limitation and the representatives of the deceased contributory were to be treated as contributories in his place.