Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in proceedings for winding up, the Court could require managing agents who were officers of the company and who claimed a lien over company funds to deposit the money in Court by way of interim preservation under section 185 of the Indian Companies Act.
Analysis: Section 185 empowers the Court to act summarily where the person concerned is an officer or other specified person and the property in his hands prima facie belongs to the company, if it is just and convenient to secure its preservation. The existence of a claimed lien does not create an absolute bar to such interim relief. On the admitted facts, the money was shown in the company books as company cash in the agents' hands, the agents were officers of the company, and the Court was entitled to protect the fund pending adjudication of the lien claim. The Court also recognised the broader power to preserve the subject-matter in dispute pendente lite.
Conclusion: The interim direction to secure the disputed amount was justified, but the order was modified so that the sum was to be deposited in Court to await adjudication of the lien claim, rather than paid out to the Official Liquidator immediately.
Ratio Decidendi: A court winding up a company may, under its summary and inherent powers, order interim deposit or preservation of company funds in the hands of an officer notwithstanding a claimed lien, where the money is prima facie company property and such protection is just and convenient pending final determination of entitlement.