Compulsory winding up denied where creditor majority, lack of insolvency evidence, and viable reconstruction favour voluntary resolution.

Compulsory winding up petition concerning a bank was dismissed because creditor affidavits and meetings showed a substantial creditor majority opposed compulsory liquidation, contemporaneous exhibits did not establish inability to pay on the petition date, petitioners failed to prove undue preference, and viable reconstruction proposals with voluntary liquidation mechanisms were preferred; the petition was also treated as mala fide due to inconsistent representations and timing to frustrate shareholder and creditor resolutions, and the subsequent appeal against dismissal was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petition filed on 22 June 1931 seeking compulsory winding up of Dawsons Bank should be granted.

Analysis: The court applied section 174 of the Indian Companies Act and considered (i) the bona fides of the petitioners and surrounding communications, (ii) the wishes of the creditors shown by affidavits and meetings, (iii) whether the bank was unable to pay its debts on 22 June 1931, (iv) allegations of preference between classes of creditors, and (v) whether the proposed scheme of reconstruction made compulsory winding up just and equitable. The court found evidence that creditors representing a substantially larger amount opposed compulsory winding up, that exhibits and contemporaneous statements did not establish insolvency on 22 June, that petitioners could not prove undue preference, and that reconstruction proposals and the creditor majority favoured voluntary liquidation and reconstruction. The court also treated the petition as mala fide given inconsistent representations and the timing of the petition to frustrate shareholder and creditor resolutions.

Conclusion: The petition for compulsory winding up is dismissed; the appeal against dismissal is dismissed (in favour of the respondent).

---