Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the processes of cutting, drilling, punching and pressing galvanized pipes into earth pipes amounted to manufacture, and whether the duty paid on clearance of such earth pipes was refundable.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the same issue had already been decided in connected appeals, where it was held that the galvanized pipe, after the processes undertaken by the assessee, became an earth pipe, which was a different commercial commodity having a distinct name, character and use. In view of that determination, the duty paid on clearance of the earth pipes could not be treated as erroneous payment.
Conclusion: The processes constituted manufacture, and the assessee was not entitled to refund of the duty paid.