Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2005 (8) TMI 344 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Jurisdictional defect in block assessment notice under Section 158BC cannot be cured by consent, waiver, or later extension of time. A notice under Section 158BC that allowed less than the statutory minimum 15 days was held to be jurisdictionally defective and incapable of sustaining ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Jurisdictional defect in block assessment notice under Section 158BC cannot be cured by consent, waiver, or later extension of time.

                          A notice under Section 158BC that allowed less than the statutory minimum 15 days was held to be jurisdictionally defective and incapable of sustaining the block assessment. Section 292B did not cure the defect because it affected the substance of the notice, and later extension of time could not validate an initially void notice. On annulment of the assessment, the refund objection under Section 240 also failed because the amounts adjusted by the revenue were not shown to be outside refund relief on the facts. A fresh assessment was not warranted, as that would permit a second attempt to cure a jurisdictional failure.




                          Issues: (i) Whether a notice issued under Section 158BC granting less than the statutory minimum time is invalid and renders the block assessment void; (ii) Whether such defect is cured by Section 292B when additional time is later granted; (iii) Whether, upon annulment of the block assessment, refund consequences under Section 240 apply so as to deny refund of amounts adjusted against tax liability; (iv) Whether the assessee could be denied relief by directing a fresh assessment after treating the notice as invalid.

                          Issue (i): Whether a notice issued under Section 158BC granting less than the statutory minimum time is invalid and renders the block assessment void.

                          Analysis: The notice under Chapter XIV-B had to specify a period of not less than 15 days and not more than 45 days for filing the return. A notice granting a period of less than 15 days did not comply with the mandatory requirement and could not confer jurisdiction. The defect went to the root of the proceedings and was not a mere irregularity. Consent or a request for extension could not create jurisdiction where the statute had not been obeyed.

                          Conclusion: The notice was invalid and the assessment founded on it was without jurisdiction, in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (ii): Whether such defect is cured by Section 292B when additional time is later granted.

                          Analysis: Section 292B cures only mistakes, defects, or omissions that do not affect the substance and effect of the notice as required by the Act. A notice that itself violates the minimum statutory period under Section 158BC is not in conformity with the intent and purpose of the provision. Grant of extra time later could not validate an initially void notice.

                          Conclusion: Section 292B did not save the defective notice, in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (iii): Whether, upon annulment of the block assessment, refund consequences under Section 240 apply so as to deny refund of amounts adjusted against tax liability.

                          Analysis: Refund under Section 240 was considered in the context of annulment of the assessment. The amounts relied upon by the revenue were not voluntary tax payments for the block return, but adjustments made from other sources. The proviso invoked by the revenue did not apply on the facts, and the denial of refund was not sustainable.

                          Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to refund relief, in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (iv): Whether the assessee could be denied relief by directing a fresh assessment after treating the notice as invalid.

                          Analysis: Once the statutory notice was found to be invalid, a remand for a fresh assessment would amount to giving the revenue a second opportunity to cure a jurisdictional failure. Mandatory statutory compliance could not be relaxed by ordering a fresh round of assessment.

                          Conclusion: No direction for fresh assessment was warranted, in favour of the assessee.

                          Final Conclusion: The block assessment failed for want of a valid jurisdictional notice, the curative provision did not apply, the refund objection was rejected, and the revenue's appeals failed.

                          Ratio Decidendi: In block assessment proceedings, strict compliance with the statutory minimum time in the notice is jurisdictional, and a notice that fails that requirement is void and cannot be validated by consent, waiver, or Section 292B.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found