Appellate remand on claim for interest upheld where the authority was competent to direct reconsideration on merits.

An appellate remand directing the lower authority to consider a claim for interest on merits was held to be valid, because the Commissioner (Appeals) was competent to remit the matter for fresh consideration and pass appropriate orders. The Tribunal found no legal ground to interfere with the remand direction. The appellate challenge was therefore rejected, and the remand order was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellate direction remitting the appellant's claim for interest on merits to the Assistant Commissioner called for interference.

Analysis: The appellate order was treated as a remand directing the lower authority to consider the claim for interest on merits and pass appropriate orders. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) was competent to issue such a remand and that no ground for interference was made out in the appeal.

Conclusion: The remand direction was upheld and the appeal was rejected.

Ratio Decidendi: An appellate remand directing consideration of a claim on merits is valid where the appellate authority is competent to remand, and such an order does not warrant interference in appeal.

---