TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal overturns Rs. 10,000 penalty for misleading statement on raw materials. No violation of Central Excise Rules.</h1> <h3>DILIP TRYAMBAK DESHMUKH Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI-VII</h3> DILIP TRYAMBAK DESHMUKH Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI-VII - 2001 (133) E.L.T. 206 (Tri. - Mumbai) The appeal was against a penalty of Rs. 10,000 imposed on the appellant under Rule 209A and Rule 210. The penalty was for giving a misleading statement regarding shortages and excesses of raw material. The Tribunal found no breach of Central Excise Rules and allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order.
TaxTMI 